What the...?

[ibneko]

From NitaiGouranga@aol.com
Subject: Gouranga
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:20:01 -0000
Message body:
Call out Gouranga be happy!!!
Gouranga Gouranga Gouranga ....
That which brings the highest happiness!!

--FULL RAW SOURCE--
From NitaiGouranga@aol.com Tue Feb 1 18:20:47 2005
Received: from Nitai1 (ppp-80-47-207-233.lns.access.uk.tiscali.com[80.47.207.233](untrusted sender))
by rwcrmxc19.comcast.net (rwcrmxc19) with SMTP
id <20050202001915r1900mkampe>; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:20:02 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [80.47.207.233]
From: "Neateye" <nitaigouranga@aol.com>
Subject: Gouranga
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:20:01 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-Priority: High
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message body:
Call out Gouranga be happy!!!
Gouranga Gouranga Gouranga ....
That which brings the highest happiness!!
----
That's it. That's all there was in the e-mail. No link, no advertisement of any sort (other than gouranga... which brings the highest happiness....? o.O).

Strangest piece of spam I've gotten in a long time.

Oh, and speaking of spam, here's one that cracked me up. It's um... work safe, I guess.

Comments

[porsupah.livejournal.com]

Ah, spammers are weird little creatures, in much the same way lampreys are. (Does any male actually think that photo's a good one for this particular purpose, given the simple implications?) I've had a few, presumably acting simply as validations, which terminate even midway through the SMTP conversation, so I wind up with not even a subject line.

I need to look into the Californian statutes - they're as pifflingly weak as anywhere else in the US, but ISTR they did provide for a private right of action, affording pretty much an automatic $500 per judgement.

("No drugs".. except, of course, those we supply for 10 for $200)

[tinkleneko.livejournal.com]

hmmm... funkyness..... O.o